| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
NickS
.
Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 10411
Location: Nr. Basinggrad, UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Addam
.
Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Posts: 971
Location: In the Gateau
|
 Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:34 am Post subject: |
 |
|
It's almost there, I'm not a fan of the headstock though and I would feel the need to round off that awkward corner of the pickguard and the end of the fretboard.
I think you could juat swap the neck out for something more conventional looking. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
speedfish
.
Joined: 27 Oct 2011
Posts: 1148
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Addam wrote: |
It's almost there, I'm not a fan of the headstock though and I would feel the need to round off that awkward corner of the pickguard and the end of the fretboard.
I think you could juat swap the neck out for something more conventional looking. |
Yeah, needs 6 inline headstock. Nice to see someone else utilizing this shape.
_________________
Disciple of Pain
"I'm like the monkey screwing the skunk. I haven't had enough, but I've about had all that I can stand!"
"Born to Lose. Live to Win." Lemmy Kilmister |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankhanu
.
Joined: 10 Nov 2009
Posts: 2959
Location: Nova Scotia
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, all in all, it's not a bad effort.
_________________
| ekwatts wrote: |
| That's American cinema, that is. Fucking sparkles. |
Donate to Ankhanu Press |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
paul_
.
Joined: 27 Jul 2006
Posts: 9750
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think reverse headstocks look silly even when it's a Firebird or SS or something, so don't really mind.
_________________
| Aug wrote: |
which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang?  |
| robertOG wrote: |
| fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck" |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WayToHip
.
Joined: 20 Feb 2014
Posts: 199
Location: Alberta, Canada
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it looks cool, and I don't look at headstocks a lot. I prefer 3 to a side headstocks actually, less thought goes into what tuner I'm holding.
It is also 648mm, or 25.5" scale. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mark76
.
Joined: 09 Jun 2012
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I KNEW I'd seen that body shape somewhere before  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NickS
.
Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 10411
Location: Nr. Basinggrad, UK
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mark76 wrote: |
| I KNEW I'd seen that body shape somewhere before |
Are you buying one? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
honeyiscool
.
Joined: 01 Feb 2011
Posts: 2072
Location: San Diego, California
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| WayToHip wrote: |
I think it looks cool, and I don't look at headstocks a lot. I prefer 3 to a side headstocks actually, less thought goes into what tuner I'm holding.
It is also 648mm, or 25.5" scale. |
It also makes the instrument a bit shorter. I like the 3+3 design. I don't know if I prefer it.
_________________
Kicking and squealing Gucci little piggy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Uploader
