www.shortscale.org

Ian · . Joined: 03 Feb 2007 Posts: 554 Location: What do?

http://www.myspace.com/ianshanetyler

Listen to the first song.

James · Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 10:50 pm Post subject:

It sounds like it would work fairly well if you turned the vocals down a hell of a lot. It's hard to get a feel for the balance of everything else with the vocal so loud, but it seems ok underneath.
_________________
Shabba.

Ninja Mike 808 · . Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 1643 Location: DFW

aen · Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 7:02 pm Post subject:

What is that distortin effect on the guitar?
_________________
High quality, low popularity Ecstatic Fury
https://theronaldraygun.bandcamp.com/album/surrender-dorothy

Doog · Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 7:05 pm Post subject:

Maybe a bit more focus of low mids on the bass and roll some of the lows off- when I turn my sub down, the bass pretty much dissapears. I'd favour a little more snare too, but that's just personal really.

Vocals down a bit I guess too, but they're hardly ridiculously loud- it's a very "pop" kind of mix.

I like how the other guitars fade out for the start of the solo.

As always- chuck a 192kbps mp3 up for proper listenz, myspace sucks the life out of stuff.
_________________
musics

Ian · . Joined: 03 Feb 2007 Posts: 554 Location: What do?

Thanks guys!

The Distortion is from a Naylor head.

The solo is using a flange/delay effect with the same sound.

The octaves at the end are a mesa boogie mark II head (Like the blue album)

I sent you an email with the mix doog

Doog · Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 8:37 pm Post subject:

When did you get a Mark II head? TAKE A PHOTO NOWWWWWWWW!

Mix sounds a bit better at a higher quality, dude. I'd definately put a bit more low mids/upper low end in the bass though- it'll definately make the mix a bit fuller sounding and help the bass not get lost on less rumbly hi-fi setups.
_________________
musics

Ian · . Joined: 03 Feb 2007 Posts: 554 Location: What do?

It sounds just like the blue album sounds. Especially with my P90'd SG.

I've had it for a good half a year now. I'll take some pics, its sweet.

James · Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 1:56 am Post subject:

Ninja Mike 808 · . Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 1643 Location: DFW

Ian · . Joined: 03 Feb 2007 Posts: 554 Location: What do?

maybe his speakers are out of phase or something haha.

Ninja Mike 808 · . Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 1643 Location: DFW

Ian · . Joined: 03 Feb 2007 Posts: 554 Location: What do?

I definitely have the vocals mixed more pop than rock. But they aren't TOO loud.

Doog · Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 11:52 am Post subject:

James · Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 12:22 am Post subject:

Ian · . Joined: 03 Feb 2007 Posts: 554 Location: What do?

I just got called soft pop rock

Shocked

word.

Sloan · Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 7:42 am Post subject:

I finally got around to listening, I just started. No problem with the vocal level for me. Very radio-friendly vocals.
It's hard to critique mixes on myspace, but this sounds pretty good so far, lots of bass, but that's good for modern stuff, rite?

Sonds fine.
_________________
Record your next album with me in Atlanta, GA. It'll be a good time.

JamesSmann · . Joined: 20 Apr 2006 Posts: 11579

Doog · Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 2:51 pm Post subject:

Handmedowns from my hi-fi fixated Dad (just bought a tube hi-fi amp Rolling Eyes

) , used to be used on his main home work PC. I've actually got a previous model, only has controls for volume, amount of sub volume and "Attitude" which is more or less a treble/upper mids control.

Love 'em to bits, I've had zero problems and they sound great. The speakers and amp all have proper sprung terminals and beefy cables, so you'd be hard pushed to fuck it up. Very cool for mixing/mastering, since you can disconnect the main speakers and just listen to how the sub reacts, compared some "pro" recording, or just turn the sub down to listen to the mids and highs.
_________________
musics

Doog · Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 2:52 pm Post subject: