View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
william .


Joined: 15 Dec 2008 Posts: 1186
|
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
warhol wasnt a hack. his pieces in person can be striking.
i'll resist the temptation to turn this into a "BETTER THAN WHAT U DID STFU." poast.
that devi ever shit is not so hot. and, warhols art couldnt be recreated in 20 seconds. but itd be interesting to see someone try.
anyone who has ever taken and developed photos, enlarged them, transfered them to emulsion, then screened them can tell you how long of a process it is. that he did it on (often) a huge scale makes it even moreso.
but this paint flicking shit. yeah, 20 seconds. 19 seconds, even.
but youll never recreate it, really. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001,
2002 phpBB Group
 Blocked registrations / posts: 638985 / 0
Help support this site by
clicking the above link!
|