Jaguar abuse

jculpjr · Post by **jculpjr** » Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:29 pm

Photos not for the squeamish.
http://maine.craigslist.org/msg/3547735805.html

HNB · Post by **HNB** » Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:40 pm

Poor guitar.....

NickS · Post by **NickS** » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:15 pm

Looks like one of the pole pieces took a hit too.

George · Post by **George** » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:34 pm

Portland

Freddy V-C · Post by **Freddy V-C** » Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:09 pm

Holy shit, that looks awesome.

Post by **Hurb** » Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:06 pm

''The body and headstock are in pretty rough shape (crazy story behind it)''

''I wanted teh kurdtz and the only way to get it was to stab the shit out of my guitar with a screwdriver''

Viljami · Post by **Viljami** » Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:16 pm

Kill'd it with fire + shotgun?

also:

Dear lord, is early 90's supposed to be "vintage" nowadays?

cur · Post by **cur** » Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:27 pm

Viljami wrote:Kill'd it with fire + shotgun?

That's what I thought.

othomas2 · Post by **othomas2** » Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:41 pm

I seen that on Offset believe it or not...

BearBoy · Post by **BearBoy** » Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:43 pm

Viljami wrote:Dear lord, is early 90's supposed to be "vintage" nowadays?

Cool. I've suddenly become the owner of a vintage Jaguar. Might start spending more time at Offset.

Paradigmforcosmos · Post by **Paradigmforcosmos** » Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:59 pm

it's relicing, dudes.

Kurbis · Post by **Kurbis** » Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:37 am

This makes me sad.

I felt horrible after I accidentally put a paint chip in my Jag yesterday.

theshadowofseattle · Post by **theshadowofseattle** » Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:32 am

GOTDAM LOL

moore65 · Post by **moore65** » Thu Jan 24, 2013 5:49 am

I would buy that...for a reasonable price ($200). That guy is f'n nuts to think he can get $500 for it!

jumbledupthinking · Post by **jumbledupthinking** » Thu Jan 24, 2013 7:28 am

What sort of trust fund hipster douche does this to their guitar? I'm guessing the "Crazy Story" is actually banal as fuck & is truthfully along the lines of "yeah...I drank some beers & smoked some weed & my parents paid for everything I own anyway, so I, like, thought what the fuck yeah? 'Cos I'm anti-establishment like that".

NickS · Post by **NickS** » Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:57 am

Viljami wrote:Dear lord, is early 90's supposed to be "vintage" nowadays?

>25 years = "Vintage". I should have bought that 80s Strat in Wunjo back in 2007, the one with the jack socket on the scratchplate; it would have been "Vintage" within a couple of years.

paul_ · Post by **paul_** » Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:47 am

That whole "vintage" thing is getting ridiculous. Vintage refers to a certain desirable era of production, not a passage of certain amount of time. Most '70s Fenders aren't really even vintage, they've just gotten old/expensive enough where nobody's arguing.
But "vintage" Japanese reissues? Eat a dick.

Viljami · Post by **Viljami** » Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:19 am

I understand calling a "lawsuit" Ibanez or Greco etc. vintage, but a 92' or a 94' MIJ Fender, never! Also +1 on the 70's Fenders, I see them selling for ridiculous prices all the time.

Bacchus · Post by **Bacchus** » Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:12 am

paul_ wrote:That whole "vintage" thing is getting ridiculous. Vintage refers to a certain desirable era of production, not a passage of certain amount of time. Most '70s Fenders aren't really even vintage, they've just gotten old/expensive enough where nobody's arguing.
But "vintage" Japanese reissues? Eat a dick.

Yup. I'd regard Vista series as being vintage, but not 70s Fenders for the most part.