brainfur wrote:build seemed ok but looked so gash would not play
I got to play one a few days ago. Sounded good and felt nice but it's a project guitar. I could see myself buying it and changing out the bridge, bridge pickup, pickguard and wiring. I would of loved the neck better if the finish wasn't so thick. The neck pickup makes the guitar. A great guitar for effects pedals.
brainfur wrote:yeah its there go play it and then smash it into the glass counter
Funny story, second to last time I was there I was playing a thinline tele and when I went to put it back I didn't get it in the rack thing so it dropped on the floor and I quickly put it back and left. I checked it quickly and it seemed fine, but the next time I came in it wasn't on the rack anymore. No one called me out on it so far so it's all good.
Beau In Space wrote:I hear this guy uses a capo.
Josh wrote:THATS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU POUR WINE ON IT INSTEAD OF BEER.
euan wrote:stop trying to put guitar mojo arrows on yuri's dick
damienblair17 wrote:Looks like a Rondo or some other knockoff company that *almost* got it right.
That is basically what I said when I saw pictures of these after they were first announced. It looks (and I'm sure feels) like a cheap knockoff intended for beginners.
From the hang tag, it looks like they are being sold only at GC in the US? (At least for now...) Another reason I wouldn't buy one. I still want to try it though, maybe it'll make me eat my words.
Didn't realize these shortscale teles had small bodies as well and am similarly put off, certainly at that price anyway.
I second the "Rondo" comment, as the proud owner of an SX gloss-necked '60s-cover'd Jazz Bass I'd put up against the 3x more expensive CV '60s any day. Fender are just dicks.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang?
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"