What's a good inexpensive, lighter HH set neck guitar?

Talk about all other types of guitars. Jazzmasters and basses go here!

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
Nick
Y'SEE!?
Posts: 9520
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:13 am
Location: Albany, NY

Post by Nick »

honeyiscool wrote:
nyck wrote:PRS SE.
haters will hate, but they sound good and the quality is pretty sweet. But of course, they're kinda ugly.
Yeah honestly I should consider them, too, shouldn't I? They fit exactly everything I said, except they look like PRSes.
If you're gonna do one:
Image

If you want SUPERLITE:
Image
User avatar
hotrodperlmutter
crescent fresh
Posts: 16665
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA

Post by hotrodperlmutter »

^ not set neck, but super nice. i want one real hard.
dots wrote:fuck that guy in his bunkhole.
User avatar
cooter
.
.
Posts: 1257
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Location: Blue Ridge, GA
Contact:

Post by cooter »

You can pick up an 80s Electra Workingman for $200-$300 on ebay.
Electra made some great guitars, really well made. Not sure if they made a set neck model though.

I just bought a 1975 Electra Super Rock for $300 and it's more Les Paul than half of what Gibson is putting out these days.
The Super Rock is really heavy like a Les Paul, the Workingman model is thinner and lighter.
Smells like Rock n' Roll
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

Thom wrote:
Doog wrote:Cort do some very decent setneck stuff, no idea of the availability or prices in the US though.
+1 I used to have an M200 and it was pretty nice.
+2.

I always forget about Cort. Unfashionable but great value.
User avatar
UlricvonCatalyst
.
.
Posts: 767
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:19 am

Post by UlricvonCatalyst »

....and I always forget that people care about set necks. I guess that makes all my suggestions redundant. :roll:
User avatar
westtexasred
Shortscale Cultural Minister
Posts: 16977
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:10 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Post by westtexasred »

Nick wrote:
If you want SUPERLITE:
Image
They had 2 of those used at my friends store.
User avatar
pumpkin
on the road to bantown
Posts: 859
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:36 pm

Post by pumpkin »

UlricvonCatalyst wrote:Also, have LAG guitars made it across the pond at all? I've heard lots of good reports about them, though I've never tried one myself.


A local guitar ripoff emporium store here in Dublin has them, I wasn't impressed to say the least. Decorated plywood IMHO.
User avatar
Nick
Y'SEE!?
Posts: 9520
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:13 am
Location: Albany, NY

Post by Nick »

UlricvonCatalyst wrote:....and I always forget that people care about set necks. I guess that makes all my suggestions redundant. :roll:
Some people like the heel better on set necks/neck thru. Other than that set neck is rather pointless, some of my favorite guitars are bolt on and have loads more sustain than most set necks I've played. Not like it's the end all magic sustain booster that noobs and cork sniffers alike claim it is.
User avatar
honeyiscool
.
.
Posts: 2072
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:36 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Post by honeyiscool »

My best sustaining guitar is my new Daisy Rock semi-hollow (bolt-on). I think it's because it's one of the hardest maple necks I've ever played. It also has a rounded heel, which makes the whole access thing moot.

Honestly, at this point, I'm thinking about just getting a 24.75" Warmoth neck for my Jagmaster and just calling it a day.

Or selling my Jagmaster and buying a white Daisy Rock Rock Candy (bolt-on) because dude... if that sustains anywhere as close to my current Daisy Rock...
Kicking and squealing Gucci little piggy.
User avatar
thickarms
.
.
Posts: 277
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:06 pm
Location: Leeds, UK

Post by thickarms »

Don't know how easy they are to get hold of outside the UK but I got a Gordon Smith for about £300.
Absolutely solid guitar, super light, pretty thin neck. Have loved every Gordon Smith I've played

Image
User avatar
pumpkin
on the road to bantown
Posts: 859
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:36 pm

Post by pumpkin »

thickarms wrote:Don't know how easy they are to get hold of outside the UK but I got a Gordon Smith for about £300.
Absolutely solid guitar, super light, pretty thin neck. Have loved every Gordon Smith I've played

Image
+1

Great guitars Gordon Smiths
User avatar
honeyiscool
.
.
Posts: 2072
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:36 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Post by honeyiscool »

So yeah, because I'm a little girl, I am getting this guitar instead:

Image

It's only $219 and judging from the fact that they stick have the "coil split" sticker on the tone knob, it's probably pristine.
Kicking and squealing Gucci little piggy.
User avatar
pumpkin
on the road to bantown
Posts: 859
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:36 pm

Post by pumpkin »

Nick wrote:
UlricvonCatalyst wrote:....and I always forget that people care about set necks. I guess that makes all my suggestions redundant. :roll:
Some people like the heel better on set necks/neck thru. Other than that set neck is rather pointless, some of my favorite guitars are bolt on and have loads more sustain than most set necks I've played. Not like it's the end all magic sustain booster that noobs and cork sniffers alike claim it is.
Agree.
Set necks are usually considered to have better transmission of vibration between body and neck therefore a beefier, fuller tone.

It is usually thought that a bolt on neck will have less sustain, It is also generally thought that a bolt on neck will have a brighter, snappier tone with more note definition, a result of a slower transmission of vibration between body and neck.

This is bullshit of course. People came to these conclusions because because the guitars they were playing were Gibsons or Fenders. Fenders Teles and Strats generally have a brighter, snappier tone with more note definition and Les Pauls do have a beefier, full tone and slightly more sustain. This has next to nothing to do with how the neck joint is made (bolts, screws, body through, or set neck) and a lot more to do with the woods used in the bodies, necks, the bridge design, the number of windings on the pick ups, pretty much everything but the the type of neck joint.

I guess back in the day when you had like only 3 or 4 types of solid body electric guitars to choose from people came to these conclusions about neck joints based on opinion and not any sort of scientific method.

more or less the Gibson screw necks I have owned sound like the set neck ones, the Fender set necks I have owned sound like Fender screw necks.
User avatar
gaybear
Inventor of the Blues
Posts: 9697
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:52 pm
Location: hard corvallis, oregon
Contact:

Post by gaybear »

not hh, but what i want next

Image
plopswagon wrote: Drunk and disorderly conduct is the cradle of democracy.
User avatar
honeyiscool
.
.
Posts: 2072
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:36 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Post by honeyiscool »

pumpkin wrote:This is bullshit of course. People came to these conclusions because because the guitars they were playing were Gibsons or Fenders. Fenders Teles and Strats generally have a brighter, snappier tone with more note definition and Les Pauls do have a beefier, full tone and slightly more sustain. This has next to nothing to do with how the neck joint is made (bolts, screws, body through, or set neck) and a lot more to do with the woods used in the bodies, necks, the bridge design, the number of windings on the pick ups, pretty much everything but the the type of neck joint.

I guess back in the day when you had like only 3 or 4 types of solid body electric guitars to choose from people came to these conclusions about neck joints based on opinion and not any sort of scientific method.

more or less the Gibson screw necks I have owned sound like the set neck ones, the Fender set necks I have owned sound like Fender screw necks.
This is entirely correct. What's more, that one study that they did showed that a bolt-on actually has more sustain than a set neck, which has more sustain than a neck-through. In any case, we play amplified instruments. How often are we hobbled by the lack of sustain? Just turn the gain up.

One of the things I noticed about playing a semi-hollow, though, is that it just feels more alive, like the notes just don't want to die. It's probably in my head, honestly.
Kicking and squealing Gucci little piggy.
User avatar
gaybear
Inventor of the Blues
Posts: 9697
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:52 pm
Location: hard corvallis, oregon
Contact:

Post by gaybear »

[youtube][/youtube]
plopswagon wrote: Drunk and disorderly conduct is the cradle of democracy.
User avatar
hotrodperlmutter
crescent fresh
Posts: 16665
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA

Post by hotrodperlmutter »

lel
dots wrote:fuck that guy in his bunkhole.
User avatar
gaybear
Inventor of the Blues
Posts: 9697
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:52 pm
Location: hard corvallis, oregon
Contact:

Post by gaybear »

haha wrong thread, but really i just wanted to post it anyway
plopswagon wrote: Drunk and disorderly conduct is the cradle of democracy.
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

honeyiscool wrote:So yeah, because I'm a little girl, I am getting this guitar instead:
► Show Spoiler
:lol:

Looks like a Hamer crossed with a Schecter with an Italia finish.
User avatar
honeyiscool
.
.
Posts: 2072
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:36 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Post by honeyiscool »

Yeah, Daisy Rock guitars are pretty much Schecters. They even use the same rear route covers.
Kicking and squealing Gucci little piggy.