Recording strings

Guitar techniques, music theory, recording and anything to do with actually playing your guitar

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
roachello
Cunt Punt
Posts: 1358
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 8:28 am
Location: The LBC
Contact:

Recording strings

Post by roachello »

What do you guys suggest someone use if they want to record cello or violin but can't get the real thing? Keyboards, synth, or another program?
User avatar
Mages
súper crujiente
Posts: 7454
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: MD
Contact:

Post by Mages »

pinky on the volume knob
User avatar
Ian
.
.
Posts: 555
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 11:22 am
Location: What do?

Post by Ian »

If you want the sound of one cello, make friends with a cellist. And then make sure you use a nice large diaphram microphone on it. (Make friends with somebody who has a studio)

:lol:


But really, having the real thing is way cooler than any modeled sound can do. I wish I could have had real piano on all of my tracks.
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23114
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

Get handy with yer E-Bow would be another option-o.

You could always programme it in MIDI if your track is to a click, providing your MIDI sounds don't sound as ASS as the ones on my PC's internal soundcard do..

While it can sound very mechanical, it'll give you a LOT of control over accents, note lengths and that, so with a bit of patience, can get you fairly close to the real thing.
Last edited by Doog on Tue Apr 22, 2008 10:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39163
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

Synth all the way. if you're not looking for a lead line and just some augmentation it will be fine.
User avatar
vivadeluxxe
.
.
Posts: 1288
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:58 am
Location: Manchester
Contact:

Post by vivadeluxxe »

You could use string samples if you wanted a really realistic string sound, but they'd be hard to program fluently for a complicated part with a lot of notes, fine for one note stuff tho...
User avatar
James
Nutmeg
Posts: 10645
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Boxingham Palace

Post by James »

Ian wrote:If you want the sound of one cello, make friends with a cellist. And then make sure you use a nice large diaphram microphone on it.
Why a large diaphragm?
Shabba.
User avatar
Sloan
Sexy Predator
Posts: 11797
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:02 am
Contact:

Post by Sloan »

The Reason Orkester sound bank in conjunction with the built-in sampler thing works ok. As long as your hasing it in teh background or supporting the song and not having it a featured instrument, it'll be ok.
joshua
.
.
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 4:30 pm

Post by joshua »

Mike wrote:Synth all the way. if you're not looking for a lead line and just some augmentation it will be fine.
User avatar
aen
Turdscreamer
Posts: 7696
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:07 am
Location: ELECTRIC WARRIOR
Contact:

Post by aen »

Sloan wrote:The Reason Orkester sound bank in conjunction with the built-in sampler thing works ok. As long as your hasing it in teh background or supporting the song and not having it a featured instrument, it'll be ok.
+1

Actually, if you have Reason, I programmed a pretty fucking sweet cello patch on Subtractor, mostly by luck, Im not liek a whiz or anything, but it sounds really real, for liek long bowed stuff.


BUt whatever synth setup youre working with, Id spend some serious time programming a resonable facsimile, or osmething cool enough to substitute and be interesting, rather than exact.
High quality, low popularity Ecstatic Fury
User avatar
Reece
.
.
Posts: 10359
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Kent, UK

Post by Reece »

+ 1 to reason. it's quality for supplemental strings.

i can't get a decent piano out of it though, it always sounds a bit thin.
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39163
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

joshua wrote:
Mike wrote:Synth all the way. if you're not looking for a lead line and just some augmentation it will be fine.
Bloody hell that's a 10 month bump.
User avatar
Reece
.
.
Posts: 10359
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Kent, UK

Post by Reece »

woah i thought this was new.

a ten month bump, to say precisely NOTHING AT ALL.

to say this has been a bumpy start would be akin to saying hitler had a slight problem with jewish people.
JamesSmann
.
.
Posts: 11873
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:15 pm

Post by JamesSmann »

i use reason...a "borrowed" copy and i buy their sound library upgrades when they go on MEGASAYLE a musicians friend. i recently got some kick ass folk sounds for it...the slide guitar is just epic. and the double-bowed fiddles are fantastic.

i think those sounds are pretty authentic. but i rarely do much more than half and whole note swells with the strins...i'm working on my pizzicato and super twirly-whirly string accomps. it's hard with keyboards and such when you're not really a "keyboard player" per se.
User avatar
william
.
.
Posts: 1186
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 5:59 pm

Post by william »

its interesting that you guys use reason. i always found it really limited, but i dont think i was quite understanding its strong points. always seemed like i was playing canned instruments, i never felt like there was much "me" there.

sorry, im no help with this. depending on how natural you need the strings to sound, you could try sampling and cutting up strings from other recordings. aphex twin did this to great effect. and venetian snares, too.

there are some synths that people say are good for strings, but i think they mean good for synthy strings, like youd hear in a dubstep track or something. still, that can be a neat sound.
User avatar
Reece
.
.
Posts: 10359
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Kent, UK

Post by Reece »

what were you using sampler/synth wise? reason takes quite a bit of tweaking to get sounding a bit real.
User avatar
william
.
.
Posts: 1186
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 5:59 pm

Post by william »

Zaphod wrote:what were you using sampler/synth wise? reason takes quite a bit of tweaking to get sounding a bit real.
i dont remember now, frankly. its been a few years now.

i had reason 3, i think. i much prefered reaktor for synthy fun and beatmaking, which i also stole had somehow at the time.
JamesSmann
.
.
Posts: 11873
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:15 pm

Post by JamesSmann »

Zaphod wrote:what were you using sampler/synth wise? reason takes quite a bit of tweaking to get sounding a bit real.
i don't remember offhand which version of reason i "borrowed" but it seems fairly new. i'm using its NN-XT sampler with the orkester pack, the omnisoundz and the folk pack. i totally LOVE reason for doing what sloan said, and backing tracks with orchestration. i'm still getting the hang of "mixing in" the synths so they are present without being over-powering. i've been using a LOT of strings and shit on our stuff lately...and i loves it.
User avatar
Reece
.
.
Posts: 10359
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Kent, UK

Post by Reece »

woah.

i've never even look at the orkester sound bank! hahaha i'm gonna have to have a play about.
JamesSmann
.
.
Posts: 11873
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:15 pm

Post by JamesSmann »

Zaphod wrote:woah.

i've never even look at the orkester sound bank! hahaha i'm gonna have to have a play about.
yeah dude, the NN-XT is also a key component for me as well, because i'm not a harcore patch/loop programmer. so the nn-xt does it all for you, you just choose the patch you want. maybe if i get some time today or tomorrow i'll post up some samples of stuff i've done with it.