fill in the blanks

Talk about all other types of guitars. Jazzmasters and basses go here!

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
robert(original)
.
.
Posts: 7174
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: somewhere in the midwest

fill in the blanks

Post by robert(original) »

i have been trying to collect data about the the vintae fender acoustics.
if anyone can inprove on what i have PLEASE DO SO, by copying, and pasting, and then re-inserting correct information.
i pretty much know when the earliest models started but im not sure on the last date of production.

fender malibu
3 issues
1st run
65-73?
2cnd run
85-88?
3rd run
06-present(revamped with blocks)

fender kingman
2 issues
1st run
64-72?
2cnd run
06-present(revamped)

fender newporter
2 issues
1st run
65-72?
2nd run
85-88?

fender sonoran
3 issues
1st run
65-70?
2nd run
85-88?
3rd run
06-present(new colors)

fender villager
1 issue
66-68

fender shenandoah
68-70's?

fender redondo
later 70's - early 80's?

fender palimino
mid 60's?

fender king(rosewood)
63, possibly sooner, very rare and very valueble.
User avatar
DGNR8
.
.
Posts: 4220
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 2:51 am
Location: DC Area

Post by DGNR8 »

Did you get all that from HERE? That's alls I know about em.
Yell Like Hell
User avatar
robroe
Bon Jovi Fan Club!!1
Posts: 49936
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:00 pm

Post by robroe »

you cant take everything on that website as gospel though.

this little snippit of eletist bullshit was also taken from the site

http://www.provide.net/~cfh/fender.html
The Low-end Fender solidbodies such as the DuoSonic, MusicMaster, and the Mustang are not collectable and are considered student models. Even with the recent popularity of the Mustang, it's still a short scale, entry level instrument. All these instruments share that basic problem of a shorter scale length, and lower quality electronics.
1. they are collectable....i would say the mustang on the wall at the Binghamton Guitar Center for 1999.99 would attest to that.
2. lower quality electronics? thats just stupid. they use all the same pots, the same wire, and pickups made in the same factory out of the same materials.

Brown and white tolex amps (1960-1963), and some "black face" models (1964-1967) are highly regarded by players. "Silverface" and later models (post 1967) are fine utility amps, but have no collectable value.
so every fender amp according to this page made after 1967 has no collectable value.....? ??? fucking dumb
dots wrote:incesticide
User avatar
robert(original)
.
.
Posts: 7174
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: somewhere in the midwest

Post by robert(original) »

thats all that i have collected just by watching ebay and searching thru pics from google and whatnot.
those guys are fuckheads.
aren't the stang pups the same as strat pups(i mean vintage) but they had a different casing?
im glad they are around tho, they say everything has a colectability rating of an "f" which means it keeps the vintage market for these things pretty low, which means i can afford to buy one.
User avatar
Ninja Mike 808
.
.
Posts: 1643
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:06 pm
Location: DFW
Contact:

Post by Ninja Mike 808 »

I can't remember where I read it, but the pickups were a little different. Same materials, they're just wound less. I think the info I'm speaking of was collect by Seymour Duncan, but I'm not sure...
User avatar
Justin J
.
.
Posts: 2224
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 6:42 pm
Location: usa

Post by Justin J »

robroe wrote:so every fender amp according to this page made after 1967 has no collectable value.....? ??? fucking dumb
that was true about ten years ago when this website was last updated.
User avatar
jcyphe
.
.
Posts: 16888
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:18 am

Post by jcyphe »

That site has been seriously outdated for some time.