Creating a conversion neck?

Painting? Routing? Set-up tips? Or just straight-up making a guitar from scratch? Post here, and post pics!

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
Pens
less dickface
Posts: 13982
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:51 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Creating a conversion neck?

Post by Pens »

Okay, so a side project I have is to get my old Decca Tulip back to playing order. The fretboard on it was completely snapped in half while attempting to unglue it to fix a bad truss rod, due to internal rotting.

I ordered a blank slab of rosewood. I can pretty much refret this however I want. It's a Strat scale guitar, so my intention was to do the fretboard as a 24" conversion neck. I thought about doing a true 24" board, but that would require moving the bridge forward, and I don't have the room to do it in relation to the stock routing, and I'm not keen on carving up a 60's guitar, no matter how shitty it is.

So, I wanna leave the stock bridge placement, slap a new conversion fretboard on there, and go with that. Problem is, I can't find any online source for fret spacing. Do I just simply use a standard 24" scale fret positioning but shifting the whole mess forward an extra 0.75" or is it more than that?

I am also considering just making a new body out of plywood but I figure I'll start by making this fretboard a conversion.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
User avatar
jcyphe
.
.
Posts: 16888
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:18 am

Post by jcyphe »

http://www.buildyourguitar.com/resource ... rptclc.htm

This lets you enter scale length you want, plus fret amount.
User avatar
theworkoffire
.
.
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: London

Post by theworkoffire »

If you're keeping the bridge where it is, changing the scale of the neck involves moving the nut position, so to get a 24" scale neck you'd have to move the nut 1 1/2" nearer to the heel. Just a guess, but I'd say that's going to look pretty wrong.
User avatar
Pens
less dickface
Posts: 13982
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:51 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Post by Pens »

jcyphe wrote:http://www.buildyourguitar.com/resource ... rptclc.htm

This lets you enter scale length you want, plus fret amount.
Yeah, I'd found that but it doesn't seem to really explain conversion necks. I think I'll have to just use the 24" scale for the frets.
theworkoffire wrote:If you're keeping the bridge where it is, changing the scale of the neck involves moving the nut position, so to get a 24" scale neck you'd have to move the nut 1 1/2" nearer to the heel. Just a guess, but I'd say that's going to look pretty wrong.
Not if I shift the fretboard a bit to overhang as well. Maybe I could do 24.75" Gibson scale, which will only involve a 0.75" shift.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
User avatar
SKC Willie
Bunk Ass Fuck
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:46 pm
Location: Columbia, MO
Contact:

Post by SKC Willie »

you'd have to the move the nut up 1.5 inches unless you're physically moving the neck closed to the bridge.

if you measure a conversion neck on a strat body, the nut-to-bridge measurement is still 24 inches; that never changes. So, you can move the nut, the bridge, or change the neck pocket OR hack some of the bottom of the neck off.

you can add frets to on the bottom of the neck all you want, but it won't change the scale.
twitter.com/skcwillie

follow me . . . . you won't
User avatar
cur
.
.
Posts: 7298
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:58 pm

Post by cur »

Pens wrote:
jcyphe wrote:http://www.buildyourguitar.com/resource ... rptclc.htm

This lets you enter scale length you want, plus fret amount.
Yeah, I'd found that but it doesn't seem to really explain conversion necks. I think I'll have to just use the 24" scale for the frets.
If the scale is 24" than the fret spacing will be the same. With a conversion neck vs an old school 24" neck the bridge would have to be in a different position on the body. The spacing between frets are the same if they both equal 24" scale in the end.
theworkoffire wrote:If you're keeping the bridge where it is, changing the scale of the neck involves moving the nut position, so to get a 24" scale neck you'd have to move the nut 1 1/2" nearer to the heel. Just a guess, but I'd say that's going to look pretty wrong.

Not if I shift the fretboard a bit to overhang as well. Maybe I could do 24.75" Gibson scale, which will only involve a 0.75" shift.
YOu will have to cut off 1.5 inches from the heel to make it work and then it probably won't screw on the body correctly. Only have a nub left.

Image
Image
User avatar
Pens
less dickface
Posts: 13982
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:51 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Post by Pens »

Um. No, if you move the fretboard to overhang the neck it's closer to the bridge, you don't have to chop the neck. Or remove a fret. I think I'll set this up as a Gibby scale so I don't have to move it as much.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
User avatar
theworkoffire
.
.
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: London

Post by theworkoffire »

So how will you deal with the extra 3/4" between the nut and the tuners? Surely it'll just expose the truss rod end and an ugly flat area of the maple.
User avatar
cur
.
.
Posts: 7298
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:58 pm

Post by cur »

Pens wrote:Um. No, if you move the fretboard to overhang the neck it's closer to the bridge, you don't have to chop the neck. Or remove a fret. I think I'll set this up as a Gibby scale so I don't have to move it as much.

Well then you will have to move the nut 1.5 inches in (or .75 if you go gibby). Something's gotta give.

Image
Image
User avatar
Pens
less dickface
Posts: 13982
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:51 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Post by Pens »

Correct, the nut will be closer. 0.75" isn't really that much extra space. As far as exposing, I have a full blank slab of rosewood to work with. I was thinking of doing a zero fret at the correct spot, then putting the nut back where it ought to be. Either way, the neck is mahogany so it won't look that bad.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
User avatar
Gabriel
.
.
Posts: 3178
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:46 pm
Location: NYC

Post by Gabriel »

Pens wrote: I was thinking of doing a zero fret at the correct spot, then putting the nut back where it ought to be.
That sounds like a good idea, would probably look best and in keeping with the design of the guitar too I'd think.
User avatar
Pens
less dickface
Posts: 13982
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:51 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Post by Pens »

Okay, thanks for the info guys. I'm measuring this out now, 21 frets at 24.75" scale with the zero fret shifted forward 0.75", and leaving the nut where it was.

I'm very likely going to fuck this up. I'll update once I start cutting this.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
User avatar
JohnnyTheBoy
.
.
Posts: 542
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 2:39 pm
Location: Middle England
Contact:

Post by JohnnyTheBoy »

Hey Pens!..I've come across the same problems you have!...I'm making 2 conversion necks fir my jazzmaster and bronco/mustang/duosonic II projects...
I've copied my jagmaster neck which has subtle differences to my squier cv duosonic, and I've found that the bridge will be off by about 1/4" on the jazzmaster....I'm gonna have to trim the neck pocket and guard by 1/4" towards the bridge otherwise it won't intonate...
I was under the impression that I could just stick that scale neck on the jazz and that would be it, but after measuring it, cause its a fixed bridge I'm not gonna have that adjustment I need....Be different on a tele with the long travel saddles...
User avatar
Pens
less dickface
Posts: 13982
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:51 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Post by Pens »

JohnnyTheBoy wrote:Hey Pens!..I've come across the same problems you have!...I'm making 2 conversion necks fir my jazzmaster and bronco/mustang/duosonic II projects...
I've copied my jagmaster neck which has subtle differences to my squier cv duosonic, and I've found that the bridge will be off by about 1/4" on the jazzmaster....I'm gonna have to trim the neck pocket and guard by 1/4" towards the bridge otherwise it won't intonate...
I was under the impression that I could just stick that scale neck on the jazz and that would be it, but after measuring it, cause its a fixed bridge I'm not gonna have that adjustment I need....Be different on a tele with the long travel saddles...
Interesting. Can you give me the measurements from 12th to heel? I think that's going to be the hardest part, making sure that bridge to heel + heel to 12th comes out right.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
User avatar
JohnnyTheBoy
.
.
Posts: 542
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 2:39 pm
Location: Middle England
Contact:

Post by JohnnyTheBoy »

Yeh no probs..I'd already measured both necks from nut to pocket, 12th to pocket,
12th to bridge etc...here's what I came up with..

Jagmaster
Centre of 12th to pocket = 33mm
Centre of nut to pocket = 17 1/4"
Centre of 12th to bridge (approx) = 12"
Pocket to bridge saddles (approx) = 6 3/4"

Cv Duosonic
Centre of 12th to pocket = 37mm
Centre of nut to pocket = 17 1/2"
Centre of 12th to bridge (approx) = 12"
Pocket to bridge saddles (approx) = 6 3/4"

So u can see they have differences but are supposedly both conversion necks...
The strat scale I measured was also 18 1/2" nut to pocket, 45mm centre of 12th to pocket, 12 3/4" centre of 12th to bridge, and 7" from pocket to saddles...that had a 22 fret 25.5" scale with the overhanging fret...the others have 21 frets..
Hope that's of use!
Hope that's of some use to you ;-)
User avatar
SKC Willie
Bunk Ass Fuck
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:46 pm
Location: Columbia, MO
Contact:

Post by SKC Willie »

you should talk to the andrewdoes hair guy . . . .


I know he's built a good amount of conversion neck from scratch, so I'm sure he'd be able/willing to help you out.
twitter.com/skcwillie

follow me . . . . you won't
User avatar
Pens
less dickface
Posts: 13982
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:51 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Post by Pens »

MY HAIR IS FINE. WHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO IMPLY HERE, ROBBIE??
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now