A love-hate relationship with the SM57 mic: doing it wrong?

Guitar techniques, music theory, recording and anything to do with actually playing your guitar

Moderator: mods

Post Reply
User avatar
Concretebadger
.
.
Posts: 2111
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:29 pm
Location: Leeds Leeds LEEDS
Contact:

A love-hate relationship with the SM57 mic: doing it wrong?

Post: # 1213987Post Concretebadger »

Conventional wisdom states that an SM57 is an 'essential' bit of recording gear.

I've found that for clean guitar amps it does a great job, albeit requiring quite a lot of preamp gain at 'bedroom' volumes because they're not very sensitive. For distortion - running a Muff or a Rat through an amp's clean channel for example - it more often than not sounds, well, shit. Nothing like what I hear when standing in front of my amp, or bending down to put my ear to the speaker.

I'm not sure why it's so hard to get a decent sound out of this thing. So far my theories are:
1. it's not a genuine Shure
Possible. There're a lot of fakes about, but I did some googling and mine seems to be genuine.

2. it's not sensitive enough for 'bedroom' volumes
For the sake of the neighbours, I don't crank my amps much more than the volume level of an acoustic guitar or upright piano.

3. Placement
I know dynamic mics are fussy with this, so I've tried different distances, angles and different speakers. So far most non-shitty sound comes a couple of inches from the grille cloth, right on the edge of the cone and angled slightly so it's facing the *surface of the cone*, not the *grille cloth*, dead-on.

Am I missing something? Are '57's better for LOUD guitars, not quiet ones? Is its frequency response a limitation? Should I be going down the condenser route, to get a more 'ambient' distance-mic'd sound that better approximates what you get from standing a few feet away from the amp in a room?
User avatar
Freddy V-C
NOD FLANGERS
Posts: 5178
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 4:55 pm
Location: Halifax

Re: A love-hate relationship with the SM57 mic: doing it wro

Post: # 1213989Post Freddy V-C »

Concretebadger wrote:2. it's not sensitive enough for 'bedroom' volumes
For the sake of the neighbours, I don't crank my amps much more than the volume level of an acoustic guitar or upright piano.
This, pretty much. Although to be honest I don't think there's any microphone which can record electric guitars well at bedroom volume.

It sounds like you've got your head around placement pretty well. A couple of inches from the amp, near the edge of the cone at an angle is my go-to position for most dynamic mics if I don't have much time to experiment.

You could try experimenting with a few different microphones, but I suspect that you won't hear much of an improvement. For good sounds with distorted guitars, you basically either need to be PLAYING LOUD, or you need to just use a DI and spend a long time experimenting with different amp sims until you get a sound you like.
User avatar
singlepup
.
.
Posts: 4200
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 4:27 am
Location: San Diego

Post: # 1214054Post singlepup »

Agreed. Guitar amps do tend to record best when cranked. I once recorded in a studio apartment with paper thin walls. Luckily, I only shared a wall with one person. I recorded on a Saturday at 1 pm through a half stack. Went on for about an hour before my neighbor began mercilessly banging on the wall. I did get the takes I needed, though.

If you must go the amp sim route, try the Bias/Jam Up combo if you can. I have been using Bias recently with some decent results.
User avatar
Concretebadger
.
.
Posts: 2111
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:29 pm
Location: Leeds Leeds LEEDS
Contact:

Post: # 1214932Post Concretebadger »

I'm quite lucky at the moment in that the flat above me is unoccupied...cue my DRRI running with the volume at 5 and my interface box's preamp at just over half. That seemed to work okay, but distortion's still a problem. For one thing, there's the psychological thing of people nearby objecting to a distorted guitar more than they would a clean one that's putting out a similar volume.

The amp I'm planning on getting has a built-in attenuator, so although it's still a compromise it'll get a bit closer to simulating 'real' volume.

Even so, my amp sounds fine at bedroom levels; there's no trouser-flapping punch that you get from gigging levels, but it's the difference between what my ears and the '57 are picking up. I was starting to suspect that it's a mic that needs a high SPL to reproduce the sound properly?
User avatar
Fakir Mustache
.
.
Posts: 4189
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:23 pm

Post: # 1214935Post Fakir Mustache »

Computers are weird and you may have to adjust volume in several places. In any case, record way below and boost after.

If you are getting the right frequency range but distorted, it's probably a level problem.

But if it sounds like crap and it's all farty with no bass, it could be your SM57 is busted. Happened to me. Bought it used in the '90s, and it was kind of beat up and probably from the '80s. Worked fine for many years, one day just crapped out. So they don't last forever.
plopswagon wrote:my headphone amp is made out of pieces of a resonator guitar and windup victrola.
User avatar
singlepup
.
.
Posts: 4200
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 4:27 am
Location: San Diego

Post: # 1214980Post singlepup »

Record low and boost later when recording in 24 bit, right?

Not sure I would record low in 16 bit... Would try to record at least moderate levels.
User avatar
Fakir Mustache
.
.
Posts: 4189
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:23 pm

Post: # 1215013Post Fakir Mustache »

I guess I meant moderate, I mean about 40-60% on the meter. If you go higher you might risk pegging when you play harder or activate certain effects. Although really I haven't had problems with even lower levels and I only use 16 bit.

And I'm talking about recording levels not volume of the amp. If you record the amp too low you get the acoustic sound of the guitar too, annoying unless that's what you're going for. Not to mention tube saturation.
plopswagon wrote:my headphone amp is made out of pieces of a resonator guitar and windup victrola.
User avatar
Concretebadger
.
.
Posts: 2111
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:29 pm
Location: Leeds Leeds LEEDS
Contact:

Post: # 1215017Post Concretebadger »

I probably worded my previous post badly Re: 'distortion'. It's the distorted sound coming out of the amp that I'm having problems with. Describing a sound is tricky unless you want to sound all pretentious and *amber* but the '57 lacks bottom-end and warmth unless I place it up really close to get the proximity effect. The treble region is worse though - the 'sizzle' and detail doesn't seem to be picked up and it sounds all cold, dry and mushy. I can't really describe it any better I'm afraid.

I got around the background noise from the guitar itself pretty easily though. I have my guitar, pedalboard and PC in the living room, so it functions as a control room; the cable to the amp trails under the door to my bedroom, which is where the and cab are set up with the mic. The mic cable goes back under the door into the living room so the guitar and amp are as isolated as I can get them.
User avatar
BearBoy
.
.
Posts: 6590
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:27 am
Location: Strung up to the lemons

Post: # 1217804Post BearBoy »

Did you get anywhere with your SM57?

I've been using a Rode NT-1A condenser mic to record my amps at bedroom levels. I had been thinking about getting another mic for the amps (an SM57 or e906) as the Rode is really a vocal mic so was interested to see if those sort of dynamic mics are any good if you're not cranking the amp up.
Fran wrote:I love how this place is basic as fuck.
ekwatts wrote:I'm just going to smash it in with a hammer and hope it works. Tone is all in the fingers anyway.
User avatar
Sloan
Sexy Predator
Posts: 11797
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:02 am
Contact:

Post: # 1217859Post Sloan »

I have never been a big fan of the sm57, but somehow they became a standard and i use them just about every sound gig because they are there. It's worth it to put in the practice to get some usable sounds from them. Also, another tip is you shouldn't have to use hardly any eq if you are doing it right. It's easy to want to get a bass heavy sound and this will cause conflicts when mixed with other instruments so in one aspect, since the sm57 picks up more mid range frequencies it can help. Clarity is always my goal when mic'ing amps and that can be tough when dealing with distortion etc.

I actually bought a bunch of Audix i5 mics because I could get them used cheaper than sm57's. They do sound a little different, most notably the sm57 has those gritty high mids and the i5 seems to not emphasize that as much.

This is one i5, two tracks with hardly any other processing, maybe slight eq. I was happy with it for the most part.
EMG 81 bridge position > Delta Labs tubescreamer knockoff > Jet City JCA100H > Mesa Standard Cab > Audix i5

[youtube][/youtube]
User avatar
visceral
.
.
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2014 11:05 pm
Location: USA

Post: # 1236708Post visceral »

Here's a few things that can help maybe.

I don't see anything wrong with an sm57 but I use a Sennheiser e609. If you're recording at bedroom level you could use a large condenser mic 4-6 ft away and the sm57 like 3-6 inches away offset of the center of the cone.

Something you can do is wear some headphones and while someone is playing the guitar and move the mic around and try to find a sweet spot. Sure there are different techniques so move the mic around see whats best and then fix the stand for placement.

Another thing to consider is when you're playing the guitar in your room the amp/distortion will have a particular sound in comparison to the recording. Based on gear these characteristics can change in a unique way. I for example, when I record my amp distortion sounds 10x and crazy then it does when it comes out of the amp in my room. In my room jamming I'm like "need more gain" during playback on the recording I'm like "turn down the gain" lol.

Now when recording make sure you are not adding any EQ from your software. You want to wait and do that during the mixing stage. You want nice clean natural levels "to tape."

Lastly, and don't take this personal but those distortion pedals especially the Big Muff are a bit noisy and more creative then effective. The Big Muff cuts the high frequencies out of the EQ/mix. Especially Electro Harmonix pedals...super common with them hence why I have a modified EHX pedal. But the Big Muff reminds me of crazy Jimi Octave style distortion/FUZZ.
User avatar
dezb1
The Oppressor
Posts: 7973
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:59 am
Location: glasgow
Contact:

Post: # 1241049Post dezb1 »

Got my mic placement tip from Butch Vig, turn your amp up full volume (with nothing plugged into it) then move the mic around listening for the frequencies you want to zone in on (I find this works best with headphones plugged into your recording device). Sounds weird but it works... Finding the right frequencies to begin with saves EQing afterward.
Image
User avatar
YuriK
.
.
Posts: 2344
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 11:27 pm
Location: nyc

Post: # 1241050Post YuriK »

I just stick it right in front of the speaker.
Beau In Space wrote:I hear this guy uses a capo.
Josh wrote:THATS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU POUR WINE ON IT INSTEAD OF BEER.
euan wrote:stop trying to put guitar mojo arrows on yuri's dick
User avatar
visceral
.
.
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2014 11:05 pm
Location: USA

Post: # 1241149Post visceral »

dezb1 wrote:Got my mic placement tip from Butch Vig, turn your amp up full volume (with nothing plugged into it) then move the mic around listening for the frequencies you want to zone in on (I find this works best with headphones plugged into your recording device). Sounds weird but it works... Finding the right frequencies to begin with saves EQing afterward.
^ LOL i said the same thing in the post right above you in different words but I learned that in an audio school
JJLipton
.
.
Posts: 902
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:39 am
Location: San Francisco, CA

Post: # 1244332Post JJLipton »

I am very late here. Do the guitars sound dry,far away, and thin? I think you're better off recording DI and reamping with some plug in.
User avatar
NickS
.
.
Posts: 11133
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:08 am
Location: Nr. Basinggrad, UK

Post: # 1244355Post NickS »

visceral wrote:Something you can do is wear some headphones and while someone is playing the guitar and move the mic around and try to find a sweet spot.
dezb1 wrote:..turn your amp up full volume (with nothing plugged into it) then move the mic around listening for the frequencies you want to zone in on (I find this works best with headphones plugged into your recording device).
visceral wrote:^ LOL i said the same thing in the post right above you in different words
Er, no, you didn't. Sorry.

I'm guessing the "nothing plugged in" technique is relying on noise from the amp as a noise source, in much the same way sound engineers use noise sources to check room EQ.
User avatar
visceral
.
.
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2014 11:05 pm
Location: USA

Post: # 1244471Post visceral »

:shock: I didnt catch that "nothing plugged" in part, I guess I only read the "move your mic around"...etc hahaha either way I'd rather hear the actual playing personally. In which like I said I stated the same thing in different words based on personal preference. But a cool technique nonetheless.
User avatar
brainfur
.
.
Posts: 1878
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:40 pm
Location: United States

Re: A love-hate relationship with the SM57 mic: doing it wro

Post: # 1245272Post brainfur »

Freddy V-C wrote:
Concretebadger wrote:2. it's not sensitive enough for 'bedroom' volumes
For the sake of the neighbours, I don't crank my amps much more than the volume level of an acoustic guitar or upright piano.
This, pretty much. Although to be honest I don't think there's any microphone which can record electric guitars well at bedroom volume.

It sounds like you've got your head around placement pretty well. A couple of inches from the amp, near the edge of the cone at an angle is my go-to position for most dynamic mics if I don't have much time to experiment.

You could try experimenting with a few different microphones, but I suspect that you won't hear much of an improvement. For good sounds with distorted guitars, you basically either need to be PLAYING LOUD, or you need to just use a DI and spend a long time experimenting with different amp sims until you get a sound you like.
agreed-- you can DI guitar and apply "fake" distortion and its gonna sound better than a quiet amp
George wrote:in the future there must be only guitars or only computers
theshadowofseattle wrote:TYPICAL AMERICAN BAND LIKE JAY Z, AXE BODY SPRAY, AND THE VENTURES.
Image
Post Reply