Jaguar owners opinions please

The original shortscale guitars; Mustangs, Duo-Sonics, Musicmasters, Jaguars, Broncos, Jag-stang, Jagmaster, Super-Sonic, Cyclone, and Toronados.

Moderator: mods

Post Reply
User avatar
dezb1
The Oppressor
Posts: 7973
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:59 am
Location: glasgow
Contact:

Jaguar owners opinions please

Post: # 1404694Post dezb1 »

I have sold quite a bit of superfluous guitar equipment lately and have decided the money should be invested in a Jaguar - my first Shortscale. I have two options I'd like opinions on which one you guys would recommend as I know a few guys on here (Mike, Hurb?) have proper vintage Jags and Squier variants

I fancy the player series:

http://www.google.co.uk/shopping/produ ... gK_dvD_BwE

But is it a big enough upgrade to justify the extra £200 compared to the Classic Vibe?

http://www.pmtonline.co.uk/squier-clas ... gK2XfD_BwE
Image
User avatar
benecol
Best Poster 2010
Posts: 7871
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 8:12 pm
Location: Westcountry

Post: # 1404695Post benecol »

Hmmm... Fuck that humbucker. I'm a bit out of the loop on Jag pricing at the mo; think you could snag a MIJ/CIJ for that sort of money, maybe? Hurb and Doog'll be able to advise you on the Squiers better than me. I liked the one I played, but have never owned one (had an AVRI and now have a Marr).
User avatar
BearBoy
.
.
Posts: 6590
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:27 am
Location: Strung up to the lemons

Post: # 1404698Post BearBoy »

I'm a big fan of "proper" Jaguar switching so would probably lean towards the CV over the Player. Not played either though so treat that with due scepticism.

Could you stretch to a Vintera? They do a couple of nice ones with matching headstocks.
Fran wrote:I love how this place is basic as fuck.
ekwatts wrote:I'm just going to smash it in with a hammer and hope it works. Tone is all in the fingers anyway.
User avatar
dezb1
The Oppressor
Posts: 7973
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:59 am
Location: glasgow
Contact:

Post: # 1404699Post dezb1 »

A Marr would be the ideal - but way too spendy. I'm not a fan of buying second hand guitars unless they're dirt cheap (sub £100) project guitars. Suppose I shouldn't rule it out though.

Also I rarely use a bridge pickup so the humbucker won't make much difference
Last edited by dezb1 on Sun Oct 18, 2020 5:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
dezb1
The Oppressor
Posts: 7973
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:59 am
Location: glasgow
Contact:

Post: # 1404701Post dezb1 »

BearBoy wrote:I'm a big fan of "proper" Jaguar switching so would probably lean towards the CV over the Player. Not played either though so treat that with due scepticism.

Could you stretch to a Vintera? They do a couple of nice ones with matching headstocks.
Nah the £550 for the player would be top end on a spend
Image
User avatar
Thom
lamp
Posts: 5976
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:23 am
Location: Exeter, UK

Post: # 1404702Post Thom »

I don’t see £200 difference there. Personally I’d get the CV and if anything you can use the extra on any mods or upgrades you fancy.
User avatar
dezb1
The Oppressor
Posts: 7973
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:59 am
Location: glasgow
Contact:

Post: # 1404705Post dezb1 »

Thom wrote:I don’t see £200 difference there. Personally I’d get the CV and if anything you can use the extra on any mods or upgrades you fancy.
CV seems to be about £350 vs about £550 for the player.
Image
User avatar
Hurb
Peanut the Kidnapper
Posts: 6766
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:47 pm

Post: # 1404707Post Hurb »

Get the cv. Its a great Jaguar imo .
You may want to modd the odd thing but its cheap enough.
User avatar
Thom
lamp
Posts: 5976
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:23 am
Location: Exeter, UK

Post: # 1404708Post Thom »

dezb1 wrote:
Thom wrote:I don’t see £200 difference there. Personally I’d get the CV and if anything you can use the extra on any mods or upgrades you fancy.
CV seems to be about £350 vs about £550 for the player.
Yeah what I meant is that I don’t think you’re getting a £200 better guitar.
CVs are great guitars and great mod platforms if that’s what you like, but it’s not a necessity. They are great in their own right imo.
User avatar
dezb1
The Oppressor
Posts: 7973
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:59 am
Location: glasgow
Contact:

Post: # 1404715Post dezb1 »

Thom wrote:
dezb1 wrote:
Thom wrote:I don’t see £200 difference there. Personally I’d get the CV and if anything you can use the extra on any mods or upgrades you fancy.
CV seems to be about £350 vs about £550 for the player.
Yeah what I meant is that I don’t think you’re getting a £200 better guitar.
CVs are great guitars and great mod platforms if that’s what you like, but it’s not a necessity. They are great in their own right imo.
Apologies I totally missed the point makes total sense.
Image
User avatar
dezb1
The Oppressor
Posts: 7973
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:59 am
Location: glasgow
Contact:

Post: # 1404716Post dezb1 »

Hurb wrote:Get the cv. Its a great Jaguar imo .
You may want to modd the odd thing but its cheap enough.
Do you have one Hurb? What have you changed if you do?
Image
User avatar
Hurb
Peanut the Kidnapper
Posts: 6766
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:47 pm

Post: # 1404722Post Hurb »

dezb1 wrote:
Hurb wrote:Get the cv. Its a great Jaguar imo .
You may want to modd the odd thing but its cheap enough.
Do you have one Hurb? What have you changed if you do?
I have the vintage modified but from comparing it to Doogs CV Jag I Don't think there is a massive drop in quality or much change in features. Truth be told it looks like CV is a slight improvement on the VM except for the change to Indian Laurel fretboard.

I changed the trem unit as I had a Fender one spare, the original was fine.
The bridge pickup was wound too hot so I unwound it to be closer to a proper Jag. I also put a Mute on it and changed the pickguard.
The CV has a mustang style bridge on it which many people will prefer to a stock jag bridge.

The Squier stuff is amazing quality and value right now.
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 21992
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post: # 1404723Post Doog »

I've got the CV, here's a video I did in the first few weeks:

[youtube][/youtube]

My main dislike is/was the tall narrow frets, and that was mainly down to the fact most of my guitars have been medium jumbo or vintage. That, and it's on the heavier side, heavier than the CIJ Fender and Squier Jazzmasters and Jazzes I've owned and played.

For the money, it's a great guitar of decent parts, the assembly is where they've reduced overheads.

I've not played the Player, but it's obviously more MODERN, although the CV also has that 9.5 radius, but both have the 'vintage' tailpiece placement, so it'll still get the behind-the-bridge jangly overtones. The bridge pickup on the CV is overwound, more middle-y and punchy compared to the vintage equivalent.

The pickups are good, tuners are reasonable (I replaced mine with Klusons that I'm not sure I prefer), neck profile is slim but nae skinny.

Based on a review on GuitarGuitar, the Player's not routed enough for the full rhythm circuit enchilada, so that's worthwhile considering if you were curious about modding the player to bring in more elements of the OG design.
Last edited by Doog on Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
sunshiner wrote: You don't understand my kindness, drown in shit
User avatar
gusman2x
.
.
Posts: 4198
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Location: Manchester U.K.

Post: # 1404724Post gusman2x »

So I think a MIJ is out of budget, and certainly doesn’t fulfill the new requirement. But I’d give it a second thought...

I had a VM, which I never really bonded with. I think that was more to do with the fretboard radius and the med jumbo frets though. I guess I prefer 7.25. However, it was lighter than my MIJ, and sounded (to me) far better.

It may not be important, but a s/h VM will have rosewood board, as opposed to laurel.

I’m sure Mike had a surf green VM when they first came out and rated it?
www.lowrisemusic.com

uugh, another Manchester alt/indie band
User avatar
BearBoy
.
.
Posts: 6590
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:27 am
Location: Strung up to the lemons

Post: # 1404725Post BearBoy »

gusman2x wrote:It may not be important, but a s/h VM will have rosewood board, as opposed to laurel.
Didn't they switch to Indian Laurel halfway through the VM run? I know they did with the VM Bass VIs. I think only the earlier ones are rosewood.
Fran wrote:I love how this place is basic as fuck.
ekwatts wrote:I'm just going to smash it in with a hammer and hope it works. Tone is all in the fingers anyway.
User avatar
dezb1
The Oppressor
Posts: 7973
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:59 am
Location: glasgow
Contact:

Post: # 1404729Post dezb1 »

Hurb wrote:
dezb1 wrote:
Hurb wrote:Get the cv. Its a great Jaguar imo .
You may want to modd the odd thing but its cheap enough.
Do you have one Hurb? What have you changed if you do?
I have the vintage modified but from comparing it to Doogs CV Jag I Don't think there is a massive drop in quality or much change in features. Truth be told it looks like CV is a slight improvement on the VM except for the change to Indian Laurel fretboard.

I changed the trem unit as I had a Fender one spare, the original was fine.
The bridge pickup was wound too hot so I unwound it to be closer to a proper Jag. I also put a Mute on it and changed the pickguard.
The CV has a mustang style bridge on it which many people will prefer to a stock jag bridge.

The Squier stuff is amazing quality and value right now.
Cheers for the details u just watched your video on ghe jag it does i deed look to be strung up to the lemons...

Image
Image
User avatar
dezb1
The Oppressor
Posts: 7973
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:59 am
Location: glasgow
Contact:

Post: # 1404730Post dezb1 »

Having now watched many many YouTube videos the CV looks the way to go... but now the CV jazzmaster is turning my head - I'm a large chap and wonder if the jag would look tiny hanging around my neck... bizarre question what height are you Hurb?
Image
User avatar
Hurb
Peanut the Kidnapper
Posts: 6766
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:47 pm

Post: # 1404731Post Hurb »

Haha thats hilarious! Poor YouTube trying translate my mumbled shite !

I am about 6.4 6.5 depending on how confident I am feeling.
User avatar
benecol
Best Poster 2010
Posts: 7871
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 8:12 pm
Location: Westcountry

Post: # 1404735Post benecol »

(same height as Hurb - Jags are plenty big guitars).
User avatar
Freddy V-C
NOD FLANGERS
Posts: 5178
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 4:55 pm
Location: Halifax

Post: # 1404736Post Freddy V-C »

Yeah, back when I lived at home my dad (who admittedly knows very little about guitars) would always go on about "that massive guitar!" when he saw me playing my Jaguar or Jagmaster, rather than my Tele. The body is big enough to make up for the shorter scale.
Post Reply